Last modified: Saturday, January 5, 2002 10:32 AM
The Athena/Minerva project is finally about as done as it's gonna get.
Yay! It was a gruelling project but I'm pleased with the way she turned
out. And it's nice to have a clear vision at the start of a project for
a change. What's next? I don't wanna even think about that (but you know
that I have...) And since you asked, Dumbo and Slinky (our Elephant Nose
fish and Black Knife fish, named by my wife) are doing very well. They get
their daily dose of slimy black worms delivered to their mouths via a pipette
(Dumbo is as blind and dumb as shit). The Cardinals didn't fare as well--
they've dropped like flies and been abducted by aliens though... The Ghost
Shrimp like 'em... I mean, they really like them.
Customizing is a risky pastime. I can't believe that I missed the
season finale of "Buffy, the Vampire Slayer" (@#$%#!!!) because I was so
absorbed with grinding the damn sword. Arrrrgh. That's okay though... 'Tis
the season of reruns and Sideshow Toy is reported to be shipping their plastic
version of the heroine. I'm anxiously awaiting delivery of mine, and at
least customizing won't screw with that!
Speaking of those guys, Sideshow Toy now has a page for their long-awaited
Monty
Python & the Holy Grail figures. These look interesting-- very much
in the Sideshow Toy tradition of doing cult media properties with animated
expressions and weird props. Their figures have some unique features, and
they have great sculptors, but I haven't been overly impressed by their
soft goods in the two of their figures that I presently own. They seem to
do a minimalist's job on the outfits-- not at all the attention to detail
of a manufacturer like Dragon. Of course, this keeps the price down. From
the pics, the fabric chainmail is the biggest question mark... it looks
like a novelty fabric with coarse texture approximating scale chainmail,
with perhaps a bit of metallic polyester woven in. It's difficult to assess
from photos: On King Arthur, it looks fairly realistic, but in the closeup
of Lancelot's hood, it looks cheesy. You get a lot of fabric chainmail with
these figures. It doesn't help that (at this time) you have to order all
their figures to discover whether it's a convincing enough effect for your
tastes. But theirs is a welcome inroad for that genre (in addition to Marx
Toys' Noble Knights). It's considerably more accessible to folks who
don't want to spend a wad on Cotswold's
metal knights or make their own.
Which leads ever-so-cleverly to... Scott
Baker's latest knight. CHECK IT OUT. It's friggin' incredible. Once
you see real chainmail, it's hard to accept substitutes. This knight is
detailed from the underwear out, and Scott shows you all of it, along with
informative commentary. He's loosely teasing us with the promise of an armored
horse, so be sure to pester him until he does it (but don't tell him that
I said so).
Also... you probably know this already, but I'll tell you again: Ransome
Chua has moved his site Frontline.
He's done an excellent rendition of our favorite "Gladiator" dude in Roman
General's garb, and is working on another from the same source. Congratulations
and Happy Birthday, Ransome!
Of course, you've already checked out Francis Tavares' stuff, right?
After publishing his Maximus Crowe project at his new non-WWII site, Paragon,
he's back to his first love, WWII Arnhem with some incredible paratroopers
(bunches of 'em!) at his main website, Battlefields.
Have you ever noticed how he doesn't believe in doing things in a small
way? Beautiful photography, as usual.
I'd be remiss if I didn't mention another customizer who's distinguished
himself by the quality of his work-- John Hays. He's fairly new to
the scene, in the sense that he's now got a website.
If you like Judge Dredd and customizing with a pop/superheroes bent, check
it out...
Finally (and I don't know what this has to do with anything), I took a
picture of the IntoyZ Minigun
that I was unimpressed with last month in these remarks below. I guess
one reason is that some people may want to see a picture of it because
they're considering buying it. The other reason is that it's an issue
of quality and expectations-- a very relevant subject in the world of
customizing and collecting. If you publicly ask, "is it any good?", you
might get a lot of varied opinions... just like anything else. That's
not too terribly helpful, since our standards vary so much. Yes, it's
a cool piece and it's (as far as I know) the only Minigun that you can
buy. However, relative to the quality of topnotch stuff like Yellow
Submarine's (whose ammo box is also in the pic), their piece is in
an entirely different league. That's not to say that you or I are suckers
because we bought and may like the piece-- but a comparative reference
gives an idea of what you'd be getting, especially if you're buying it
mail-order, sight-unseen. I had higher expectations when I bought the
piece, based on public postings about InToys' stuff. I can't say whether
this is a fair representation of InToys quality either... but it's just
to remind you to assess opinions with a critical eye, especially those
filled with gushing praise and no reference points. Anyone can buy stuff,
and anyone can post an opinion. But for all you know, the person writing
the review might be a Republican!
Aquariums are cool. I got the bug suddenly, decided that saltwater was
too maintenance-intensive, and settled for a big tank of tropical fish.
Of course, I bought weirdo finicky fish that require a specialized diet
of live worms... But it's fun to watch the Elephant
Nose sniff 'em out & snort 'em, then race around the tank. Some
say that you aren't supposed to have two electricity-sensor fish in the
same tank, but EN gets along fine with the peculiar Black
Knife, despite some minor quibbling over territory. Even the tank
doormats-- the Neons, Cardinals and Ghost Shrimp-- seem to coexist with
these two larger fish. Aquariums are like a fireplace in that you can
trance-out in front of them, but with the added attraction of observing
behavior. Anyway, this also appeals to me because it's another way to
create worlds (a living one in this case), and it looks rite purdy too...
Der receiver went kaput, so a new one was procured; new stuff can inspire
a spending frenzy in which you mount an expensive and lengthy upgrading
strike on multiple fronts (speakers, tv, cables, furniture, and hashing
over all the different connection possibilities)... The remote control for
the receiver is friggin' ridiculous: it looked fairly simple despite the
backlit LCD, but the front set of buttons folds back to reveal a gazillion
more underneath. Pressing a few buttons randomly brought up lists like "User1,
User2, macro..." Damn. It came with its own manual, as big as the receiver's,
and that's not a good sign. Do they really think that 95% of the customers
are gonna spend two days studying an appliance manual? Get real. Even after
you figure out all your remote controls, you're lucky if you can find a
single one which controls most of the major functions of your equipment
without too much hassle. Any you end up with 4 other redundant remote controls
that do an even more half-assed job. It's easier to layout all your remotes
on a ruler with velcro... if only they were a standard shape, with the battery
compartments in the same place. Manufacturers should standardize that stuff
and give up on the concept of "universal" remotes. Ah... the pitiful
frustrations of the modern consumer...
And that's just the free time stuff; work is another story... So that's
why Joes and Customizing have gone on the back burner. Besides, it's good
to take breaks, since that takes the hard edge off of things that don't
come out as well as you wish.
On the Joe front, the biggest recent news has got to be the acquisition
of 21C Toys by Jakks Pacific (reported by Rudy Panucci in the Sandbox).
And before that, it was Sideshow Toy's announcement that they wouldn't be
producing for the mass market. In other words, signs of some decay in the
infrastructure underlying this "Golden Age of Joe". I'd have to concur that
all these developments aren't too surprising. 21C was the least diversified
of the biggish mass-market players, with a mind-boggling product release
schedule. Certainly, a lot of factors probably contributed to this development.
I think this hobby, like most hobbies, creates a kind of tunnel vision
amongst the faithful and fanatical. That makes it difficult to realistically
assess its place in the grand scheme of things. Because it's such neat
stuff and we know so many people who are interested in it, it must be huge.
In my opinion, that was one aspect of 21C's naïve misjudgments -- 21C's
owners were interested the hobby, saw an opportunity there, and went after
it like gangbusters. I think their interest in the hobby blinded them to
some realities. And their pride blinded them to the possibility and impact
of stiff competition... but blindness to such things is one of the hallmarks
of being on a mission. How can a company do wrong if it produces a great,
highly-detailed product for a reasonable price?
Initially, that was true as they struck at the soft, unconcerned underbelly
of Hasbro. Joeheads everywhere loved the detail and the incredible value.
Hasbro probably didn't care much, as they were well-diversified in other
areas. But 21C was proud of their accomplishment, and mapped out their strategy
to get all our Joe bucks. They wanted our loyalty, they wanted our bucks,
so they listened to us (at first), and tried to give us exactly what we
wanted. I think their cockiness and pride engaged them in a game of one-upmanship
with Hasbro and inticed them into unwisely expending precious resources
on a huge blitz of products (with a slim profit margin) to battle the mighty
Hasbro. This created high expectation levels that they couldn't sustain
when the belt-tightening eventually kicked in. Hosting a flashy, expensive
convention (to outdo Hasbro's) probably didn't help much; particularly since
the war for our dollars was already being joined by other scrappy companies.
I believe that they got caught by surprise, war-weary, and unable to alter
the course of some of their long-range plans.
In the grand scheme of things, the Joe market is just not that big. For
a manufacturer, it's even smaller when the limited prospective bucks are
distributed amongst an increasingly subdivided pie. Under those conditions,
it doesn't make sense to indulge in expensive and risky projects. But 21C
listened to us when we said we wanted big detailed vehicles at a decent
price-- a terribly risky business proposition, given the fact that none
of the far larger companies had done this before. Common sense warns us
of the marketing problems-- distribution, cost and demand. True, some Joeheads
are willing to spend a large chunk of change on a $200 Stuart, but
many more live within a budget and instead buy something neat, but affordable--
perhaps a competitor's figure? Many die-hard Joeheads pinned their hopes
on picking up a Stuart from the markdown bin. It's not good for a manufacturer
when their customers rely on buying product after it's been marked down.
Sideshow Toy's decision to distribute their product outside the mass-market
isn't surprising either. Despite how good a product they produce and how
well it did in Toy Magazine reviews, the buyers for retail distribution
chains make the decision based on their prediction of their customer's buying
habits. They don't care whether you're donna buy it; they're interested
in whether you represent a large enough body of consumers. While toy collectors
may be a fanatical and vocal group, their numbers pale when compared to
toy-buying parents with children.
21C and Sideshow Toy aren't dead. 21C is being picked up by Jakks Pacific,
who will probably use their acquired assets to enhance their product lines;
those products with a broader mass-market appeal. And Sideshow Toy isn't
compromising anything-- they're just scaling back their production numbers
and matching it with more appropriate distribution avenues. Sure, they'll
probably be more expensive and not as convenient to acquire, but it doesn't
make sense for them to overproduce so that we can benefit from the wonderful
bargain-bin deals. Like all self-limiting evolutionary mechanisms, the Joe
market is what it is-- We may see aberrant blips of quality and value due
to the ambitions, quirks and inexperience of the producers, but eventually
reality takes over and it stabilizes at the point where supply, demand and
profitability meet.
She's baaaaaaak... Despite the way it may seem, I have been busy
working on something... I just don't have anything to show for it yet, 'cept
the virginal headsculpt that I've already shown, a long time ago. Yep, this
stuff takes a long time, squeezing hobby time in around the regular work
& sleep schedule. Rushing isn't a good idea. So... how much time? The last
update here was Monday, April 9th; over a week ago. At that point I'd just
begun to dissect the Barbra Underwire figure. Since then, putting in hours
before and after work and a big block of time on the weekend. This was just
to reconfigure an old figure, which you'd think would be a minor no-brainer.
But it wasn't and she's still not done yet. All this is required before
beginning any work on the costuming, which is where the vague concept of
this project started. That's a deferred payoff somewhere down the road...
(No, it's not supposed to be Chesty Morgan from the Fellini flick.)
In the meantime, I ordered and received the IntoyZ
Minigun... you know, the gatling gun used in the movie, "Predator"?
Sheesh, what a disappointment. I mean, it's not horrible or anything like
that. It's so... ordinary. Yeah, the barrels turn, and the top trigger
clicks. Whoopie. If you've been spoiled by any of the outstanding detail
and working features of the Yellow Submarine stuff, you'll probably be
likewise bummed. It reminds me of the vintage Hasbro stuff, and seems
like an accessory which would be packaged with a figure, not an exotic
aftermarket piece.
I had a similar reaction to the BBI Cy Girl, "Shadow", but for
different reasons. Yes, she's a looker and it's a great figure, like all
their others. That's sort of the problem for me-- it's not much of a thrill
to accumulate variations on the same theme, relative to the thrill of customizing.
Occasionally, a product will come out which is genuinely exciting by virtue
of innovation or a new standard of Quality, and customizing goes on the
back burner, temporarily. In this case, she was unboxed, briefly examined
and shelved. For me, customizing is a far more involving experience than
collecting.
More and more people seem to be "kitbashing" nowadays. The accepted definition
seems to be: Creating a figure from clothing and accessories assembled from
various sources. In the old days, we used to call that "dressing dolls"
;^), but I suppose that doesn't sound very manly. Sarcasm aside, this approach
encourages you look at figure collecting from a "parts" perspective and
the collectability of a figure loses its power. (You've got to get over
the "Mint-In-Box" mentality before making that leap.) Increasingly,
I've gotten away from that, as I feel a little funny about using stock stuff
on my figures. It's not a deliberate snobbism, but I think it's a natural
progression as you become more adept at the craft side: You want to feel
the pride of creatorship for as much of the figure as you can. Nevertheless,
as you look at store-bought figures less from the standpoint of kitbashing
parts, you're more inclined to purchase them out of a collecting habit and
leave them untouched. So it's like you come full circle; the collector and
customizer aspects become more distinct, with the collecting side becoming
almost like a duty that you don't get as much pleasure from. Very weird.
(But I do unbox 'em.)
Totally off the subject: Macs rock. I'm a PC-owner but use both systems,
and have recently had the pleasure of setting up a Mac G4 Server and iMacs
for a computer lab... wow... talk about S-L-I-C-K! Nothing makes you feel
more godlike than remotely watching and grabbing control of a workstation
or locking the user out midsession while blanking out his screen with, "Game
Over, Dude!". Power brings out the worst in us though, and should be tempered
by wisdom. But if you've ever thought you had any privacy on a network,
think again. The technology's out there and everything you do can be observed
and logged. In addition to those pervasive surveillance cameras and locators
which log how long you've spent in the john. It's 1984 all over again.
I got caught up in the Gladiator spectacle midway through the "Generic
Fantasy Warrior" project. Wow. What incredible costuming! I must say that
it influenced some of the final look of that project, like changing the
shoulder guards and the hairstyle, and fostering an interest in Roman stuff.
I even bought "The Roman Legions Recreated in Colour Photographs"
(Daniel Peterson), which may come in handy in the future. But ol' Studly
ain't supposed to be Russell Crowe. That's a tempting project, but RC's
become a popular subject of customizing lately, and the world doesn't need
mine. Besides, I don't want a movie character in my little world of fantasy
characters; that compromises ownership of the "world". It would
be much better to use ideas from the movie's costuming and create my own
characters. Sorry Russell.
One of the most striking things about the movie and the historical genre
is the level of intricate decorative detail in both the weapons and outfits.
Apparently, such frills weren't limited to high-ranking officers; I've read
that common soldiers sometimes carried ornately decorated swords and knives,
possibly as a way of carrying their wealth with them. This came as a surprise
to me, since I'd assumed that generic warriors would be equipped very plainly.
Hey, these were primitive people right? Surely not as clever and talented
as us??? Hah! The lack of such decoration was one of my after-the-fact regrets
about the GFW project (besides now disliking the helmet). Some of this can
be fixed later, if I get re-motivated.
Decorative detail isn't exceptionally difficult to produce in a modelling
medium like clay or putty. It just takes time. The difficulty is in rendering
it in the proper materials. Metal doesn't sculpt like clay. And silver painted
plastic doesn't look like metal. Electroforming is a partial solution to
that, but some of the fine detail is lost in the polishing process. (You
can't see this in the pic, but it's pretty impossible to polish in the small
crevices of detail. They get filled with jeweler's rouge, fortunately hiding
the electroformed granules.) I believe that the biggest challenge (and creative
opportunity) facing customizers is to take the hobby beyond paint & plastic
modelling, and use more authentic materials, transforming this from a toy
hobby to an art hobby. Something like this: George
Stuart's Historical Figures. Yowza!
RANT: THE STATE OF THE
CUSTOMIZING BIZ Is small-time commercial customizing dead? If not,
it's got an awfully weak pulse. What was once a dignified practice of
selling complete figures and outfits has been reduced to selling parts
and recasts of parts so that customers can finish their "kitbashes", made
primarily from store-bought parts. This was a natural consequence of standard
customizing practices and the entry of big manufacturers in the hobby.
Small customizers are now left to fight over the table scraps.
One of the cornerstones
of the smalltime customizing business model was that they would be able
to capitalize on their unique subject matter and that which was not available
from the large manufacturers. But most of us didn't want really
unique-- we just wanted more variety. As the larger manufacturers introduced
more variety to their lines, customer's desires were fullfilled, at low
cost. The definition of "unique" got pushed further out into the periphery,
where the demand -- mainly from the die-hards connoisseurs of esoterica
-- is a far smaller market than the slightly unique stuff. It appears
that the philosophy of producing what the big boys haven't already done
leaves only scattered possibilities here & there. If it's something the
manufacturers haven't already made, customers may be willing to wait until
they do. Customizers pursuing these table scraps may be drawn to recasting
parts from the manufacturers. Those who still produce something unique
are holding their breath. So in a few short years we've witnessed the
customizer as artist whittled down to parts seller. They're practically
a non-entity in the current Joe scene. It's not all that gloomy
though. Some customizers quietly focus on a different angle-- providing
parts, but of a higher quality than those produced by the manufacturers.
Dave Tedesco of the Patch Hut caters to this market. Manufacturers simply
don't want to invest in producing detail of that quality because it adds
to the cost. Being a fairly low-cost item, they're an affordable after-market
purchase for those who want better than off-the-shelf quality. Of course,
this niche hasn't gone unnoticed by some mid-sized manufacturers: Yellow
Submarine comes to mind. It's a new day. Garage customizers
simply cannot compete equally with the manufacturers on their terms of
standard toy production: They can't cast as well, they're limited in the
types of materials they can cast, and the cost is higher. It would seem
that the way for customizers to regain their stature as artists is to
focus on true craftsmanship, to employ unusual materials to produce in
art-like quantities, and price their work accordingly. Lower demand would
alleviate the production and delivery delays that frequently give customizers
a bad name. If you can't produce for the market you've targeted, change
your target market. Go upscale. This philosophy wouldn't fly well with
the masses, but the masses can't be the target market. You have to wrestle
with the big manufacturers for that market. Consider Samurai armor:
How would one go about recreating the incredible detail and colors of
the ribbons? Molded plastic and paint would be a likely production solution
for something to be sold at Target. Imagine the same thing done up with
real thread and metal. No comparison. The practical route is required
for production line stuff, but should customizers let those standards
limit their vision? A customizer can't compete on those grounds. All the
manufacturer has to do is recognize the demand, and the poor customizer
is back looking for those table scraps.
Yeah, it's a way-out-there idea and I've touched on it before...It's easy
to be a smug armchair quarterback when you're not in the game! If it came
to pass, it wouldn't benefit me since I couldn't afford the stuff: I'm not
in the target market for expensive art or jewelry either. But someone's
gotta be, right? And wouldn't it be kewl to go to websites and see some
outrageous top-dollar customized Joes?
Meanwhile, on the down-to-earth, boobs 'n' bullets plane, here's a link
to Figure.com's Tokyo
Toy Fair coverage of Takara... you know, the ones who make the CY Girls?
05/26/01- First off, if
you like 'em Russ Meyer-ized, you must check this out: Ariella's
House. Kinda hard to know what to say after that, huh? Huuuuuh???
A Volkian masterpiece, that's what I sez...
05/15/01- hsssssssss...sput...sput... Athena. It's a project without
steam. There have been a few setbacks and disappointments (which I'll document
in the project article), but that's not the full story. Recently, my energies
have been distributed elsewhere; it's the aquarium and the a/v stuff that's
to blame.
04/18/01- Hey, Cleopatra is finally out on DVD, 4 hours
of it, plus another 2 hours of documentary about the film that changed Hollywood.
Can you say "Spectacle"?
04/05/01- More electroplating fun. Minx was ripe for this treatment,
and now she's finally wearing a real metal bra. Woo hoo... my wife's,
next! It was a lot of trouble to go through, but I try to convince myself
that it was worth it. I don't think I'll redo the knights though-- there
are just too many pieces and it would take forever. Did I mention that the
work begins after you've electroformed the pieces?